On terror rhetoric, Public Safety Minister ignores RCMP and his own advisors

July 29, 2015 – Anna Mehler Paperny, Global News

Public Safety Minister Steven Blaney’s office ignored edits that would have toned down a counter-terror statement issued in January, according to a document obtained by Global News.

Instead, the statement, issued Jan. 26 in response to an ISIS audio file calling for attacks on Canada, used language Canadian law enforcement has called “inflammatory.”

An e-mail obtained through an access-to-information request includes edits to a statement that replaces “jihadist” with “terrorist” and “declared war on” with “threatened.”

statement edits

The statement released online doesn’t include those edits, however.

blaneyjan26statement

When Global News asked why the edits weren’t made, and whether there’s concern this language could alienate people, we received this response:

“The international jihadist movement has declared war on Canada.

“Canadians are being targeted by jihadi terrorists simply because these terrorists hate our society and the values it represents.

“The Anti-terrorism Act, 2015, will provide our police forces with the tools and flexibility they need to protect Canadians against serious and evolving threats from terrorist organizations like ISIS.”

(The Anti-terrorism Act, Bill C-51, faces a constitutional challenge alleging it violates Canadians’ Charter rights.)

The federal government has come under fire for its counter-terror rhetoric, which has focused almost exclusively on Muslims and jihadist terrorism.

According to a 2012 RCMP report, using language similar to that employed in the release is a bad idea.

“Terms like ‘Islamic terrorism,’ ‘Islamist terrorism,’ ‘Jihadism’ and ‘Islamofascism’ succeed only in conflating terrorism with mainstream Islam, thereby casting all Muslims as terrorists or potential terrorists,” reads an RCMP report on terrorism and language titled “Words Make Worlds.”

“Distorted and inflammatory linkages between Islam and terrorism can serve to convince Muslims — both in the West and in the larger Islamic world — that the West is, in fact, their enemy.”

And using the term “jihadi” as shorthand for “terrorist” actually validates extremist messaging, the report says.

“Jihad … describes the effort to live in the way that God intends for human beings and to find the inner will and discipline to live according to the basic tenets of Islam,” the RCMP report reads.

“By referring to extremists as jihadis we effectively recognize their actions as being in the path of God and, therefore, legitimate. And in opposing jihad and its practitioners, we risk characterizing ourselves as the enemies of Islam.”

The National Council of Canadian Muslims has communicated its misgivings on terror terminology to the federal government, says Amira Elghawaby, the council’s communications director.

“It’s disappointing that the minister did not accept the edits from his public servants,” she said.

“Using this kind of terminology stokes fear. It creates concern about Muslim communities when in fact Muslim communities are just as concerned about violent extremism. They are partners looking for solutions.”

READ MORE: Are you already violating the feds’ anti-terror bill?

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s